Additionally, while Samsung uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon in its phones, it fabs those chips for Qualcomm, including the latest Samsung also has SoCs of its design, the Exynos, which it uses in phones it sells in the global marketplace. So, yes, Apple is extremely competent in this area; it scores an 8, while Samsung scores a Apple blows Samsung out of the water in terms of the native ecosystem. For virtually everything in apps and services, Samsung has to rely on Google.
So, while Google gets an 8 for its ecosystem in terms of the breadth and quality of its service offerings on Android, Apple Scores a 9 because I think its wearables services are vastly superior to what Google has now. I believe its Music ecosystem and games and financial offerings are also better.
I think you can also argue that Google's apps and services as implemented on iOS are as good or work better than the Android version in some cases. Samsung is getting a 6, and even with that, I think we are generous.
Part of Apple's magic is how easily all of its products work together without the user having to do much, if anything, to make it work. Samsung has a line of products from fridges to dryers to phones and smartwatches. But there always seems to be one thing or another that doesn't work right. They don't control the total experience. Samsung tends to take its cues from Apple when it comes to how well integrated its products should be with each other. However, I am still ranking Samsung lower than Apple; it gets a 7, and Apple gets a 9.
The 10 best smartphones. Samsung doesn't have its own ecosystem unless we talk about integrations with its specific services and its Tizen OS used on Gear smartwatches and Smart TVs.
For everything else, it depends on Google because it owns the Android OS, so in this metric, Samsung is scoring very low with a 3. Between the two communities, the commercial activity is heavily prioritized toward iOS. Cupertino is also much more in touch with its developer base than Google, so Apple is scoring a 9 while Google scores a 7.
I don't think you can fairly compare Apple and Samsung's support, let alone Apple's support with every other Android device manufacturer on the market, or even for Google's flagship Pixel. Apple has its retail stores just about everywhere. In cases where you don't, its phone support is sensational, follow-through is excellent, and it will make sure your device is repaired by an authorized service center even if you cannot get it repaired at an Apple store.
Google has only recently got its vendors, including Samsung, to commit to a three-year support plan as of August of last year. Samsung has recently upped the ante by including the fourth year of security and bug fixes, but there's no comparison.
Apple scores a 9, and Samsung scores a 7. It's night and day when you compare Apple and Samsung. One is entirely proprietary iOS , and the other is based on an open-source core Android. While I might quibble as to the openness and transparency of Google's APIs on the various services it has, and that you cannot install Google Play Services on any Android device that doesn't have it without jumping through all kinds of workarounds like on Amazon Fire and Huawei , it is still a far more open platform than what Apple provides.
By virtue of using Android, Samsung gets a 6, Google gets an 8, and Apple gets a 2. As easy as it was to declare Samsung the winner in platform openness, this is just as easy to put Apple in the lead in privacy and security.
Yes, Samsung has Knox, and that's great. But Apple's track record and the lack of keeping hardly any personal logs or information on users bodes well for its privacy efforts. Google, on the other hand, wants as much data about us that it can collect. At its core, Google is a data and advertising company. The Android ecosystem is chock full of malware and exploits and bad actors on the Play Store.
It's become comical of what the Toxic Hellstew has become with all the different OS variants and vendor implementations over the years. I think Google has done a better job with privacy controls and security hardening on Android 11, so it gets a 6. Because Samsung is inheriting Google's work and implementing its KNOX and bootloader protections and other specific security hardening for its devices, it is also getting a 7.
Apple overtakes Samsung as the biggest smartphone vendor The news is confirmed by a report from Counterpoint Research, which noted a slightly higher estimated How much Samsung is worth?
Over the last ten years, We have used various Samsung phones. However, Samsung phones start to slow down after a few months of usage, roughly months.
Not only Samsung phones slow down dramatically, but Samsung phones hang a lot. Even though iPhones last longer than Android phones, it will still break down in time. But there are a lot of things that you can do extend its lifetime. To give you some idea, here are some helpful tips that you can follow. Apple iPhone 11 The iPhone 11, which was the most affordable iPhone of turned out to be the highest selling smartphone in the world last year.
Apple sold The first iPhone was launched June 29th whilst the first Samsung Galaxy Android smartphone was released June 29th , a full 2 years after. That is impossible. Apple is a company loyal to its OS, iOS. It is impossible for Apple to buy any Android-supported phone. Market research firm Strategy Analytics in a report this week estimates Samsung sold more smartphones in the U.
They aren't quite as cheap as some other manufacturers' budget handsets, but in return you get the Samsung stamp of quality — and a mobile phone that feels more expensive than it actually is. If you don't use your smartphone for much more than the basics, this is a very valid option.
Following the success of the original, Apple re-released an all new SE in It's already proven popular among those who don't like larger phones.
Read our iPhone SE review for more. Hot on the heels of the 12 Mini the 13 Mini arrived. It's still a relatively small phone, at 5. You'll find a higher resolution 2, x 1, display and dual 12MP rear cameras including ultra-wide , along with a powerful processor.
Read our iPhone 13 Mini review for more. Each and every mobile phone that passes through our test labs is subjected to the same set of tough lab tests. This enables us to compare them side-by-side and tell you which are worthy of your money.
You can use our test results to avoid slow phones that can't take decent photos, and instead spend your money on a good-quality model that won't constantly need recharging.
We examine everything, including processor speed, screen and camera quality, battery life and call quality. Our tests are unique. For example, when testing how quick each phone is, we don't just use the industry-standard speed tests, but we also rate what it's like in everyday use. Our testers assess whether the phone is sluggish when swiping through menus and how quickly it opens webpages.
All these factors enable us to generate our star ratings and give every phone a score. Browse all our Samsung reviews and Apple iPhone reviews to see which models impressed in our test labs. Test score. Find out which flagship mobile phone is worth your money. W Which? Editorial team. Apple iPhone vs Samsung Galaxy S We narrow down some of the most important smartphone features and pit these two tech behemoths against each other to help you find your perfect fit.
Phone design. More on this Which? Best Buy mobile phones Which? Don't Buy mobile phones.
0コメント