Moreover, democracies are better for some situations as unpopular leaders can be replaced whereas dictators have to be removed by force. In addition, businesses often find it easier to work in countries where they are treated with respect and ease of doing business is prevalent. This means that business leaders often do not give that much importance to the political systems and are instead contended with how they are treated and whether their firms can grow and deliver prosperity to their stakeholders.
Indeed, as can be seen from the events of the last few years world over, many prominent business leaders often prefer to mind their business literally and figuratively.
Last, while the debate over the kind of system that is better for economic growth goes on, it is worth remembering that no matter the type of system, ultimately, the people have to benefit and this is where the crux of the issue lies. As long as there is just and equitable growth, any system manages to thrive and survive and once, people perceive that prosperity is only for the few, then the system starts to implode gradually.
View All Articles. Which is Better for Economic Growth of Nations. Similar Articles Under - Political Science. To Know more, click on About Us. The use of this material is free for learning and education purpose. The dictatorship of comparison is partially responsible for the copycat approach adopted by many governments.
Doing as others do became critically important to reassure the public that the situation is under control — in the case of the coronavirus pandemic, that meant persuading them of the necessity of staying at home, wearing masks, closing businesses and complying with whatever additional policies were put in place.
Imagine that half the countries in the world had decided to proceed with a lockdown, while the others, following the example of Sweden, had chosen to avoid strict measures; the political pressure on both sides to change course would have been almost unbearable.
Had some democratic governments introduced a state of emergency and others not done so, despite the figures for people infected and dying from the virus being comparable, such diverse responses might have provoked a collapse in public confidence. It is easy to see why governments choose to copy the policies adopted by the countries that were hit earliest by the pandemic, even if they were unconvinced that they were following the best approach.
Another much more dangerous legacy of the pandemic-induced appetite for instant comparisons is the fact that if several governments had adopted certain antidemocratic practices people would have become much more inclined to tolerate them.
If most of your neighbours have adopted media restrictions, it looks as if adopting media restrictions as a response to the crisis is the only workable policy. Democracy as a Dictatorship of Comparisons. May In that sense it bestows a plethora of rights on the people where they have the liberty to agree or disagree with the laws implemented by the legislature. In democracy, people choose their representatives who act on their behalf and make decisions as per the popular vote.
As against the tyrannical rule, in democracy people are free to acquire property and manage, sell and whatever they like to do with it. People are happy with their rulers because what matters the most in democracy is the public welfare. In contrast, dictatorship is a rigid form of government in which people are not given the liberties they could otherwise get in the democratic form of government. The head of the state is not elected by them.
The status quo remains intact till people rise and strip the government of its power. It is an authoritarian form of government in which the word of the dictator is law. He imposes sanctions upon the citizens if they dare to disobey him. However, sometimes dictatorship is not as bad as it sounds. This system has been advocated by a lot of great philosophers like John Austin.
0コメント